A级别
Pretec 667x. Respectable 5.5 effective fps with a 25/MB sec transfer rate. Sony UDMA 300x. This card fared somewhat better in RAW shooting than for JPG, coming in at 5.5 effective fps and 24 MB/sec.
PhotoFast 533x. The standard version of the 533x performed well, with an effective fps rate of 5.5 and 24 MB/sec throughput.
PNY Optima Pro. This card averaged an effective 5 fps and 24 MB/sec throughput. Both the PNY and Extreme IV cards topped the performance charts for JPG burst shooting as well.
Transcend 300x UDMA. Transcend’s newest UDMA card hit an effective 5 fps and 24 MB/sec.
Lexar Pro UDMA. The Lexar edged into the top performance tier for RAW shooting, with an effective 6 fps and 23 MB/sec throughput.
Pretec 433x. Despite its official claim, this card doesn’t approach its listed speeds of 65 MB/sec read and 50 MB/sec write in real world testing. It clocked 5.5 effective fps and 23 MB/sec.
Hoodman RAW 300X. While a marked improvement over its 280X predecessor, this card only managed 5.5 effective fps and 23 MB/sec throughput in the burst test.
SanDisk Extreme III 30MB/sec. The upgraded, UDMA-capable Extreme III series clocked in at an effective 5 fps and 23 MB/sec throughput.
ATP Pro Max II UDMA. A pleasant surprise, the ATP card — an also-ran in JPG burst shooting – joins the RAW shooting journeymen with an effective 5 fps and 22 MB/sec throughput.
Pretec 333x. Another also-ran in JPG shooting, the faster of Pretec’s original two UDMA models consistently recorded 5 fps and 22MB/sec in our RAW burst test.
Lexar Professional 233x. Lexar’s newest UDMA card achieved a consistent 5 fps with 21 MB/sec throughput.
A-Data Turbo 350x. More proof than manufacturer specs means little, this card reached a merely respectable 5 fps and 20 MB/sec throughput. It’s much better than their “266x” card but not as good as 300x cards from Lexar and Transcend, either.
____________________
缓缓,缓缓 为什么叫很奇怪的名字? 因为猫可以无时无刻的睡觉,而熊可以冬眠。。。 体重又增加了。。。超郁闷。。。
|